Augusto César Sandino blog book review Daniel Ortega Empire Imperialism Nicaragua Noam Chomsky Sandinista revolution

Empire’s War under the Radar: Nicaragua

In April of 2018 armed and unarmed proxies of the US in collaboration with Nicaraguan elites launched a warfare towards the Nicaraguan state, its authorities, its financial system and its individuals. It disrupted transportation and communications all through the nation and sabotaged the financial system. This was effected by means of acts of vandalism, arson, assault, beatings, killings, torture and rape, in addition to the development throughout the country of lots of of violently enforced roadblocks, and the staging of political demonstrations peppered with violence. By means of false and misleading home, worldwide and social media reviews and posts, the aggressors in this warfare managed to enlist quite a lot of Nicaraguans not a part of the nation’s politically reactionary elite.

The conflict correct started mid-April and ended mid-July with the removing of the opposition roadblocks. Over 250 individuals had been killed and lots of extra injured.  Greater than 250 buildings have been burned down or ransacked, with public sector property losses of over $230 million USD. GDP fell almost four%, a loss to the financial system of almost 1.5 billion USD, with job losses of up to 300,000. (NB: This evaluate calls the occasions of 2018 a “war,” though it might also be referred to as a “regime-change operation,” “coup attempt,” and more.)

This 270-page e book, Stay from Nicaragua: Rebellion or Coup?, which the editors call a “Reader,” is offered free by the Alliance for International Justice (AFGJ), the main anti-imperialist solidarity organization in the US. It consists of essays, investigative journalism, interviews and first-hand accounts of the conflict. It’s a considerate and multifaceted assortment masking a extremely vital occasion in trendy revolutionary and anti-imperialist historical past. Contributors are Alex Anfruns, Paul Baker Hernandez, Max Blumenthal, Michael Boudreau, S. Brian Willson, Jorge Capelán, Enrique Hendrix, Katherine Hoyt, Chuck Kaufman, Dan Kovalik, Barbara Larcom, Coleen Littlejohn, Gabriela Luna, Nils McCune, Nan McCurdy, Nora McCurdy, Camilo Mejía, Barbara Frances Moore, John Perry, Louise Richards, Stephen Sefton, Erika Takeo, Helen Yuill and Kevin Zeese.

Stay from Nicaragua exposes and refutes the biased and false accounts of the warfare introduced in the company and even various media, along with Washington-aligned human rights groups akin to Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Their narrative imagined a peaceful, progressive protest motion crushed by the brutal nationwide police of a dictatorial regime. Even from the broad Left (nevertheless defined) this narrative has been disseminated by North American Congress on Latin America, Democratic Socialists of America, Jacobin Journal, The Nation, The Guardian, and iconic broadcasts like Democracy Now! (262-263) In the Orwellian world we inhabit it is certain this Reader, regardless of its importance, scope and quality, will never be acknowledged by the company media or most various media, a lot much less reviewed or mentioned there.

Along with longer essays and articles, Reside from Nicaragua consists of information briefs.  From these we study of the launch of the regime-change struggle, and that some days earlier than the warfare started, a fireplace in the Indio Maíz Organic Reserve was greeted with contrived protests towards alleged authorities inaction. These protests tried however did not provoke the conflict they usually fizzled with the hearth. We study the particulars of the proposed social safety reforms by which the government sought to keep away from the neoliberal plans of the International Monetary Fund and the highly effective Nicaraguan business association, the Superior Council for Personal Enterprise. These proposed reforms have been misrepresented in opposition media and met with pretextual protests with altering rationales. These have been the protests that initiated the struggle.

These information briefs report the burning of presidency workplaces in Masaya, with the hearth spreading by way of much of the neighborhood; the academics’ denunciation of the violence and the roadblocks; the kidnapping of a highschool instructor in Managua who had marched in the protests; shootings in Carazo and Jinotepe; the burning of the pro-Sandinista radio station “Tu Nueva Radio Ya” in Managua; opposition requires a coup; Mother’s Day violence which killed 16 and wounded 30 police and Sandinista supporters in Managua, Masaya, Chinandega and Estelí; the arrest of Christian Mendoza, “El Viper,” gang leader who carried out murder, automotive theft and different crimes, and who had been answerable for the initial April violence at the Polytechnic College of Nicaragua; the burnings in Granada of the municipal constructing and vendor markets, destroying the livelihoods of a whole lot of vendors and small business house owners.

Elsewhere are vivid eyewitness accounts of the struggle, resembling this from Maribel Baldizón, a self-employed Managuan fruit-seller and Common Secretary of the Federation of Staff at Bus Stops and Visitors Lights (226):

[W]e couldn’t be in our streets; we couldn’t walk freely because we have been worrying about those who may rape, kill or steal…I sell here in the sector of the [University of Central America]…they set my stand on hearth…they shot mortars where I sell, they usually burned down [Tu Nueva Radio Ya, pro-Sandinista radio station] throughout the road…

She rejected the media’s false narrative, saying of the opposition:

What they did was towards the individuals, it was not a wrestle by which the individuals rose up, no, it was a wrestle towards the poor.

In “Correcting the Record: What is Really Happening in Nicaragua” (115, 179), Kevin Zeese and Nils McCune analyze the regime-change operation, the violence committed by opposition forces, and opposition claims of presidency use of extreme drive. They determine the class character of the battle, aptly calling it “an upside-down class war.”

In “How Nicaragua Defeated a Right-wing US-backed Coup” (57), Max Blumenthal interviews Nils McCune. This especially compelling interview provides an summary of the struggle from its inception. Additionally mentioned is the position of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)-funded Felix Maradiaga and his felony operatives in organizing and committing the violence, in addition to the position of nominally Left events of the opposition: Motion for Sandinista Renovation, and Motion for the Rescue of Sandinismo (both events recognized by the acronym MRS). McCune notes that these events lack fashionable help and provides a perpetually weak displaying in elections, all the time in single digits and almost all the time at the low finish. “They’re very strong outside the country,” McCune notes, but “very weak within the country. There’s not one MRS member in Tipitapa [McCune’s town] because it’s a very working-class city.”

Previously AFGJ and the British organization, Nicaraguan Solidarity Marketing campaign Motion Group (NSCAG), collaborated on Dismissing the Fact, a detailed refutation of two Amnesty Worldwide reviews on the violence in Nicaragua. The 55-page analysis is excerpted in the Reader (195) and obtainable free at afgj.org. Amnesty International has been a main purveyor and ostensibly authoritative source of the false narrative embraced by the media, and this debunking by AFGJ and NSCAG makes plain AI’s subservience to the anti-government narrative promoted by the US and Nicaraguan opposition press.

In “The 15 Days of Protests without Deaths” (83), Enrique Hendrix references his own longer research, “Monopolizing Death,” which examined every demise occurring throughout period of the conflict, from April 19 via September 23, 2018. Hendrix’s work refutes the fable of a well-liked peaceful opposition protest movement met with brutal police repression.

In “How Washington and Soft Power NGOs Manipulated Nicaragua’s Death Toll to Drive Regime Change and Sanctions,” (191), Max Blumenthal discusses the falsification of the dying toll by partisan NGOs in the reporting of the regime-change warfare and the use of so-called human rights organizations in propagating false and misleading accounts. These organizations embrace the Nicaraguan Middle for Human Rights, the Nicaraguan Affiliation for Human Rights, relied upon by the US Congress, the Inter-American Fee on Human Rights (IACHR), and Human Rights Watch (HRW). Blumenthal also studies the close and unconcealed ties between main younger activists of the Nicaraguan regime-change efforts and the proper wing of the US Congress.

With precision and wit, like a defence lawyer delivering a summation to a jury, Chuck Kaufman in “The Case Against Ortega” (138) eviscerates the cost that Ortega is a dictator, as well as the claims of those that assert that they stand to the left of the Sandinistas. Explaining his motivation (and startling this reviewer), Kaufman opens his piece with a collective self-reproach to the US solidarity Left:

[S]ince the [Sandinistas]’ return to power with the 2006 election of Daniel Ortega as president, we haven’t really countered the disinformation campaign towards Daniel, his spouse, and his government. We mistakenly assumed that the demonstrably enhancing lifestyle, the discount in poverty, toddler and maternal mortality, the lack of Nicaraguans coming north to the US border, the return of economic and political rights stripped from the individuals during seventeen years of neoliberal US vassal governments [1990 to 2006], would outshine the lies.

John Perry studies the position of “social media, Nicaragua’s corporate media and the international press,” in “Nicaragua’s Crisis: The Struggle for Balanced Media Coverage” (208):

Nominally the protests that started on April 18 have been in opposition to a collection of quite modest reforms to the social safety system. A vigorous disinformation marketing campaign fooled giant numbers of students and others into joining the protests by misrepresenting the particulars of the authorities’s proposals. But the students main these protests have been soon joined by those with a much wider agenda of trying to deliver down the Ortega authorities. Somewhat than arguing about modifications in pension arrangements, social media have been shortly selling regime change.

This campaign “included many more fake videos and false reports. Facebook posts reported that public hospitals were refusing to treat injured protestors. Fake videos appeared of ‘injured’ students being treated in universities and at the Catholic Cathedral of Managua.” Social media disseminated “instructions to track down and kill government sympathizers or officials.” On July 12, a caravan of motor automobiles ”attacked both the police station and the city corridor.” 4 police and a instructor have been killed. “Around 200 armed ‘protestors’ kidnapped the remaining police, took them away, beat them up and threatened to kill them.”

Perry remarks the existence of a “consensus narrative” on Nicaragua. International media, including the New York Occasions, Guardian, New Yorker, BBC, and Huffington Submit adhere to the narrative, typically evaluating Ortega’s government to famous dictatorships of historical past. And AI, HRW and IACHR repeat the false claims and invented body counts of native Nicaraguan ‘human rights’ organizations which are “aligned with the opposition, are notoriously biased and have often received US funding.”

Chuck Kaufman’s “US Regime-Change Funding Mechanisms,” briefly outlines the alphabet-agencies and fronts answerable for the regime-change operations of 2018. (171) These embrace the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the United States Company for Worldwide Improvement (USAID), the International Republican Institute (IRI), the AFL-CIO, and others, together with Nicaraguan-based NGOs, some not solely funded however created by US regime change organizations. Max Blumenthal’s essay, “US Government Meddling Machine Boasts of ‘Laying the Groundwork for Insurrection’ in Nicaragua” (174) particulars these US operations and their evolution from covert to overt operations in US overseas policy. It’s estimated that the US might have spent a whole lot of hundreds of thousands on the efforts that culminated in the regime-change conflict of 2018 (Willson and McCune, 13).

In pieces by Gabriela Luna (5), Chuck Kaufman (10, 171), Brian Willson and Nils McCune (13), and Dan Kovalik (186, 256), the long arc of the Sandinista Revolution and its accomplishments emerge, from the triumph in ’79, the reversal in 1990, and the return to energy in 2007. Throughout the first Sandinista interval:

The demise penalty was abolished. Lots of of hundreds of poverty-stricken peasants have been brought again from the lifeless. Over 100,000 families got title to land. Two thousand faculties have been built. A quite exceptional literacy campaign lowered illiteracy in the country to less than one seventh. Free schooling was established and a free health service. Infant mortality was decreased by a third. Polio was eradicated. (Dan Kovalik)

Then in 1990 got here the electoral defeat of the Sandinista Revolution, but as Noam Chomsky famous at the time, “the Nicaraguan people were voting ‘with a gun to their heads,’” understanding that if they did not vote out the Sandinistas the US would proceed the dirty warfare. Counter-revolutionary government followed, during which the features of the Revolution have been reversed: in public well being care, schooling, land redistribution, and far more. (Willson and McCune)

With the return of the Sandinistas in 2007, the Revolution began its second part, with monumental and speedy progress in poverty alleviation, food sovereignty, gender equality and far more. (Kovalik) For example, the “absolute number of undernourished people in the country has been reduced by half, access to free education and health care has been guaranteed to rural communities, maternal mortality has been reduced by 60% and infant mortality by 52%, while access to electricity has been increased from 54% to 96% of the rural population.” (Gabriela Luna)

Considered one of the accomplishments least recognized in North America are Nicaragua’s achievements in gender equity (Kovalik, 258-259): “[I]n 2018 Nicaragua was ranked number 5 in the world for gender equality by the World Economic Forum (WEF).” Only Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Finland have been ranked larger. A 50-50 regulation mandates gender equality in celebration candidate lists for elections. All this, Kovalik remarks, “is at great variance with the derisive claims of many in the US left and the human rights community that Nicaragua is being led by a sexist ‘caudillo’ in the person of Daniel Ortega, but few will acknowledge this glaring contradiction.”

The Reader consists of essays on Nicaragua that cowl far more than the occasions of 2018. Nils McCune writes of the unique Nicaraguan “popular economy” (221), which he aptly calls “Nicaragua’s Anti-Shock Therapy,” referring to Naomi Klein’s work on neoliberal opportunism, The Shock Doctrine.

Whereas the formal personal sector — represented politically via the Supreme Counsel of Personal Corporations — employs about 15% of Nicaragua staff the informal, fashionable sector employs upwards of 60%…The capitalist creates employment so as to maximize accumulation; the self-employed employee, family business or cooperative uses accumulation as a device in an effort to present employment.

And it’s the fashionable financial system that gives a lot of Nicaragua’s food, clothes and housing.

In “A Creative, Enterprising and Victorious Economy to Defeat the Coup” (232), Jorge Capelán has written an skilled, statistic-rich, but extremely readable analysis of the Nicaraguan financial system as an entire, its improvement over the final forty years all through the first and second durations of Sandinismo, in addition to during the interim neoliberal interval of 1990 by way of 2006. Capelán explains why such an financial system was capable of keep stability and supply for the wants of the individuals both during and after the warfare. This success owes a lot to strategic authorities coverage and regional alliances with Venezuela and Cuba  (e.g., Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America: Peoples’ Commerce Treaty [ALBA] and PetroCaribe).

This very financial success, as Kevin Zeese and Nils McCune explain (“Correcting the Record: What is Really Happening in Nicaragua,” referenced above), answers the query of why the trendy Nicaraguan state turned the target of empire: because the nation’s fashionable social, economic and political achievements, and its open rejection of imperialism, present the basic “threat of a good example” which may inspire other nations of the international south to interrupt free of the imperialist choke-hold. Additionally it is due to Nicaragua’s alliances with Cuba, Venezuela and the Palestinian wrestle, its help for Puerto Rican independence, its membership in ALBA, and its alliances with China for a canal challenge and with Russia for security cooperation. (122)

Taking opposition critics of the government at their word, Kathy Hoyt (143) writes that for some, together with these educated by NGOs funded by the US and the EU, “material improvements are not enough for them or they are not particularly interested in them.” As an alternative, they’ve specific complaints about the political system, the nature of Nicaragua’s political events, elections, the individual of Daniel Ortega, and so forth. However for supporters of the government, each in Nicaragua and overseas, the exceptional improvement in the lives of the poor of Nicaragua matter, and as Hoyt notes, quoting Orlando Nuñez Soto speaking of Cuba, “we are seduced by the fact that the children eat and go to school.”

In “The Catholic Church Hierarchy and Its Role in the Current Political Crisis in Nicaragua” (243), Colleen Littlejohn writes of ideological or theological variations within the Catholic Church, and the Church hierarchy’s participation in the conflict, both as instigator and organizer of the violence, and as a duplicitous negotiator and mediator. Whereas the hierarchy shaped part of the opposition, other Church parts resisted the betrayal of revolutionary Liberation Theology, which nonetheless has deep roots in Nicaragua’s Catholic laity and a few clergy.

In “US Imperialism and Nicaragua: ‘They would not let our flower blossom’,” (13) Brian Willson and Nils McCune have written a gripping introduction to the century-and-a-half history of the US attempt to regulate Nicaraguan “resources, infrastructure and a potential interoceanic canal route.” One learns that the US has used every method in its marketing campaign towards Nicaraguan sovereignty: direct and mercenary conflict, army occupation, assassination of political leaders, financing of opposition political and media organs, use of international institutions to exert strain, coup attempts, sanctions on commerce and credit, and manipulation of US credit rating firms to misrepresent Nicaragua’s financial stability. Even the world’s first use of planes to drop bombs was accomplished by the US, on Nicaragua.

In the 1930s Common Augusto César Sandino led a guerilla conflict towards US occupation. He was assassinated in 1934 by Anastasio Somoza García, who additionally massacred Sandino’s troops. Backed by the US, the Somoza family then ruled the country from ’34 to ’79. Though the Sandinista Revolution was victorious in 1979, the US seamlessly continued the counter-revolutionary efforts that preceded the revolution, beginning the Contra War. President Jimmy Carter, after briefly wavering just earlier than the Sandinista triumph, initiated the effort that was next taken up with such brutality and sadism by the Reagan administration. Ancillary methods of this warfare of homicide, torture and rape of civilians, and the destruction of hospitals, clinics and faculties, included US funding, by way of the CIA and the NED, of a reactionary pro-Contra press, economic and election sabotage, radio propaganda broadcast from neighboring Honduras and Costa Rica, and manipulation and recruitment of Nicaragua’s indigenous Miskito inhabitants on the Atlantic Coast. The Iran-Contra Affair, a US national scandal, helped the administration fund the Contra with out telling the public or Congress. This is the period when the CIA’s covert funding of opposition events for regime-change efforts in lots of places in the world started to be accomplished overtly by the NED, which loomed giant in the 2018 conflict.

But victories are not often remaining. With the current passage of the NICA Act (unanimous in each Congress and Senate), the US has introduced that its warfare on Nicaragua is way from over. This illegal siege-by-sanctions and the international marketing campaign of demonization towards the nation continues, immiserating the lives of the poor and weak particularly, identical to the unlawful, unilateral sanctions the US wields towards dozens of countries, including Venezuela, Cuba and Syria. Reside from Nicaragua should arm the solidarity Left in its resistance to the merciless and reactionary methods and goals of the empire.

Roger Stoll is a Latin America/Caribbean solidarity activist with the Process Pressure on the Americas, a three-decades-old anti-imperialist human rights group. He has revealed articles, e-book evaluations and political poetry in Dissident Voice, Counterpunch, Fashionable Resistance, San Francisco Examiner, ZNet, Jewschool, and New Verse Information. Read different articles by Roger.